Re: [Classic Mustang] Two questions, carb, and paint removal

I am sure it worked well for a 289 and is not a bad carb. But they are building a 347. With a range of 441CFM to 528CFM depending on year and model of 4100, not a lot left for the 347. Would be interesting to see how many people running the 4100 on a built motor (cam and the like)...

--- In classicmustang@yahoogroups.com, Simon <cussingat1bolt@...> wrote:
>
> It's funny Mustang Monthly took a typical 289 but with headers and dual
> exhaust to the chassis dyno and had both the Autolite and a 600cfm
> Holley tuned for best power using a wide band air/fuel monitor. At peak
> tune the Holley was giving up something like 5 ft-lbs and 5hp to the
> Autolite...
>
> I wonder why the Autolite is so highly regarded in classic Mustang
> circles except here?
>

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/classicmustang/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/classicmustang/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:classicmustang-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:classicmustang-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
classicmustang-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/